Tag: Truth in Love

  • After You Hit Send

    After You Hit Send

    Romans 12:18 NKJV

    This morning, I sent an email that was supposed to say I could find no indication that an item had been received.

    But I left out one small word.

    No.

    Without it, my sentence said the exact opposite of what I intended.

    The person receiving my email understandably read it as confirmation that the item had arrived and responded accordingly. When I saw the reply, I had to go back and reread what I’d written.

    There it was.

    The mistake wasn’t in how they had interpreted my message.

    The mistake was in the message I had sent.

    So I did the only responsible thing I could do. I apologized, corrected the sentence, and explained what I had actually intended to communicate.

    One missing word had changed everything.

    And once I hit send, the meaning inside my mind no longer mattered as much as the words that appeared on their screen.

    Before we hit reply, we have the opportunity to slow down, examine our motives, reconsider our tone, and ask whether our words will reveal Christ or merely release our anger.

    But what happens after we hit send?

    The message is gone.

    The comment is public.

    The text has been delivered.

    Our words have entered someone else’s thoughts, emotions, and understanding. We can’t reach through the screen and take them back. We can’t insist that the other person read what we meant instead of what we actually wrote.

    But hitting send doesn’t end our responsibility.

    Sometimes it reveals it.

    There are times when we realize we were factually wrong.

    There are times when our words were accurate, but our tone was unnecessarily sharp.

    There are times when what seemed clear in our mind became confusing on the page.

    There are times when anger caused us to say something we would’ve never said if the person had been sitting across from us.

    And there are times when one missing word changes the entire meaning of a sentence.

    When that happens, grace doesn’t defend the mistake.

    Grace owns it.

    We don’t need to offer an elaborate explanation for why we said what we said. We don’t need to construct an apology that quietly places responsibility back onto the person we hurt.

    I’m sorry you took it that way isn’t the same as I’m sorry I said it that way.

    One makes their reaction the problem.

    The other accepts responsibility for our words.

    If we were wrong, we can admit it.

    If we were unclear, we can clarify it.

    If we were careless, we can correct it.

    If our words caused unnecessary harm, we can try to repair it.

    That’s what still depends upon us.

    Paul wrote:

    “If it is possible, as much as depends on you, live peaceably with all men.”
    — Romans 12:18 NKJV

    That verse recognizes something we sometimes struggle to accept:

    Peace doesn’t depend entirely upon us.

    Paul begins with, “If it is possible.”

    There are times when it isn’t.

    Some people won’t accept an apology. Some will continue believing the worst about us after we’ve explained ourselves honestly. Some will interpret gentleness as weakness, disagreement as hatred, and conviction as condemnation.

    We can’t control every conclusion another person reaches.

    We can’t force someone to understand our heart.

    We can’t make another person receive truth well.

    But Paul also says, “as much as depends on you.”

    Something still depends upon us.

    We’re responsible for whether what we say is true.

    We’re responsible for the spirit in which we say it.

    We’re responsible for whether love or ego is motivating us.

    We’re responsible for correcting ourselves when we’re wrong.

    We’re responsible for repairing what our carelessness has damaged, whenever repair is possible.

    But we’re not responsible for forcing another person to agree with us, approve of us, or respond to truth the way we hoped they would.

    That distinction matters.

    Otherwise, we’ll fall into one of two errors.

    We’ll either refuse accountability by saying, I told the truth, so their feelings aren’t my problem.

    Or we’ll carry responsibility that was never ours by believing, If they reacted badly, I must have done something wrong.

    Neither is necessarily true.

    Truth doesn’t excuse cruelty.

    But a negative reaction doesn’t automatically prove cruelty occurred.

    That’s why humility has to ask an honest question:

    Was their reaction to the truth—or to the way I carried it?

    That question shouldn’t be answered too quickly.

    If their reaction exposes pride, impatience, unnecessary sharpness, or carelessness in us, then something still depends upon us. We need to own it.

    But if we’ve examined our words honestly—if they were truthful, gracious, and grounded in the love of Christ—then another person’s rejection doesn’t automatically become our guilt.

    Jesus spoke perfect truth with perfect motives, and people still resisted Him.

    Some misunderstood His words.

    Some misrepresented them.

    Some became angry because the truth confronted something they didn’t want to surrender.

    Their reaction didn’t make His words less true, and it didn’t make His love less genuine.

    We are responsible for what we say.

    We’re responsible for speaking truth with grace and allowing the love of Christ to be its foundation.

    We’re responsible for the words, the motive, and the manner.

    We’re not responsible for controlling the reaction those words may receive.

    There comes a point when continued explanation no longer produces understanding. It only extends the argument.

    There comes a point when another reply won’t bring peace. It’ll simply give frustration another opportunity to speak.

    There comes a point when we’ve done what depends upon us.

    Then we have to release what doesn’t.

    After you hit send, read the response without immediately preparing your defense.

    Listen for anything you may need to hear.

    Review what you actually said—not merely what you intended to say.

    If you were wrong, own it.

    If you were unclear, clarify it.

    If you were careless, correct it.

    If you caused harm, try to repair it.

    But if you spoke truthfully, carried that truth with grace, and grounded it in the love of Christ, you don’t have to keep arguing until the other person agrees.

    You’ve done what depends upon you.

    Speak the truth.

    Carry it with grace.

    Ground it in love.

    Then leave the response in hands other than your own.

  • When Conviction Loses Compassion

    When Conviction Loses Compassion

    One of the saddest realities of our culture is that we have become convinced we must choose between truth and compassion.

    We’re told that if we stand for biblical truth, we cannot truly love people.

    Or, if we genuinely love people, we must eventually surrender biblical truth.

    Jesus accepted neither option.

    He never compromised truth.

    He never withheld compassion.

    And somehow, two thousand years later, many of us have managed to separate what He perfectly united.

    Before we go any further, let me be equally clear about where I stand. I believe God’s design for marriage and sexuality is revealed in Scripture, and I do not have the authority to redefine what God has already spoken. At the same time, I believe every person—regardless of their beliefs, identity, choices, or lifestyle—is created in the image of God and is therefore worthy of dignity, compassion, and respect. These convictions are not in conflict. In fact, they belong together.

    ⸻

    I recently came across a simple quote that has lingered in my mind:

    “When you hold a belief so tightly you cannot see another’s humanity, it will eventually obscure your own.”

    Whether the author intended it or not, I immediately thought of Jesus.

    Not because He abandoned truth…

    But because He never allowed truth to become an excuse for forgetting the value of the person standing in front of Him.

    Think about His ministry.

    The woman caught in adultery.

    The Samaritan woman at the well.

    Matthew, the tax collector.

    Zacchaeus.

    The lepers everyone else avoided.

    The demoniac living among the tombs.

    People whom society had already categorized, condemned, dismissed, or avoided.

    Jesus never ignored their sin.

    But neither did He ignore their humanity.

    He saw people before He addressed their problems.

    ⸻

    Genesis tells us something remarkable.

    Every human being is created in the image of God.

    Not just Christians.

    Not just people who agree with us.

    Not just those living according to Scripture.

    Every person.

    Sin has marred that image, but it has not erased it.

    That truth should forever change the way followers of Christ see people.

    The person addicted to drugs.

    The man sitting in prison.

    The woman who has had multiple abortions.

    The atheist.

    The Muslim.

    The political activist.

    The LGBTQ+ individual.

    The person who hurt you.

    The family member who rejected your values.

    The coworker who mocks your faith.

    Every one of them still bears the imprint of the Creator.

    If God saw enough value in them to create them…

    And enough value in them to send His Son to die for them…

    Who am I to pretend they are beneath my compassion?

    ⸻

    James writes something that should stop every Christian in their tracks.

    With our mouths we bless God…

    And with those same mouths we curse people who have been made in the likeness of God.

    James says these things should not be.

    Think about that.

    When I insult, mock, dehumanize, or rejoice in another person’s humiliation, I am doing so against someone who still carries the fingerprints of God.

    That doesn’t excuse sin.

    It simply reminds me that sinners are still people.

    Sometimes I wonder if we’ve become so busy defending biblical positions that we’ve forgotten why God gave us those truths in the first place.

    The purpose of truth is not to win arguments.

    The purpose of truth is to lead people to Christ.

    ⸻

    Jesus never confused acceptance with approval.

    He welcomed people without affirming everything they did.

    He loved them enough to meet them where they were.

    He also loved them too much to leave them there.

    To the woman caught in adultery He extended mercy…

    Then He called her to leave her sin.

    Those are not contradictory actions.

    They are the very definition of biblical love.

    Love without truth leaves people lost.

    Truth without love leaves people hopeless.

    The Gospel has always been both.

    ⸻

    During the past month, as conversations surrounding Pride once again filled social media, I noticed something that deeply grieved me.

    Not the disagreements.

    Disagreement is inevitable.

    Christians and our culture have very different understandings of sexuality, marriage, and identity.

    Those conversations matter.

    But what disturbed me wasn’t disagreement.

    It was the hatred.

    The mocking.

    The cruel jokes.

    The celebration of another person’s pain.

    The comments that seemed to delight in making someone feel less than human.

    I couldn’t help but wonder…

    When did we decide that cruelty became a fruit of the Spirit?

    There is nothing Christlike about humiliating someone.

    There is nothing holy about ridicule.

    There is nothing righteous about treating another image-bearer of God as though they have no value.

    If we believe someone is living apart from God’s design, shouldn’t that move us toward compassion instead of contempt?

    After all…

    That’s exactly how Jesus treated us.

    ⸻

    The Apostle Paul wrote words that every believer should remember:

    “Such were some of you.”

    Those words level the ground beneath the cross.

    Every Christian has a past.

    Every Christian has needed grace.

    Every Christian has stood in desperate need of mercy.

    The only difference between us and anyone still trapped in sin is not our goodness.

    It’s God’s grace.

    That realization should produce humility instead of arrogance.

    Compassion instead of contempt.

    Tears instead of insults.

    ⸻

    Perhaps the greatest danger isn’t abandoning biblical convictions.

    It’s allowing those convictions to harden our hearts.

    The Pharisees knew Scripture better than almost anyone.

    Yet they looked into the eyes of the Son of God and could not recognize Him because their hearts had become so consumed with being right that they no longer loved the people they were supposed to shepherd.

    Knowledge had replaced mercy.

    Religion had replaced relationship.

    Truth had lost compassion.

    May that never be true of us.

    ⸻

    As followers of Christ, we should never apologize for what Scripture teaches.

    But neither should we apologize for loving the people Christ died to save.

    Those are not opposing commitments.

    They are inseparable.

    If my convictions cause me to look down on people…

    Something is wrong with my heart.

    If my theology allows me to despise those Christ willingly died for…

    Something is wrong with my theology.

    Because every person I meet is someone Jesus considered worth stretching out His hands for.

    And if He could love them enough to die for them…

    Surely I can love them enough to treat them with dignity.

    Final Word

    The world often tells us we must choose between conviction and compassion.

    Jesus chose neither.

    He embodied both.

    He never compromised truth.

    He never forgot a person’s worth.

    As His followers, neither should we.

    Because biblical conviction should never make us less compassionate.

    It should remind us just how much compassion God first showed us.